Latest Submission

Support to Phase 3 of the ORASECOM Basin-wide Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) – Plan: Overview

Overview The main objectives of this consultancy were to undertake scenario analyses, economic, water requirement projection and ecological support studies Read more

Water Resources Quality Joint Basin Surveys (JBSs)

The second 5-yearly comprehensive Joint Basin Survey (JBS2) of the quality of the water resources of the Orange-Senqu River Basin was undertaken Read more

2014 Integrated Water Resources Management Plan (IWRMP) – Summary and Documents

Purpose: This article will provide an overview of the 2014 IWRMP and provide links to the actual documents Related WIS Read more

Irrigation Water Demand Management (WP6)

Objectives The overall objective of the work package was to attain an overall understanding of how better management practices could reduce Read more

Orange River Basin

Environmental Flow Requirements for the Orange-Senqu Basin (WP5)

Objectives

The main objective for this Work Package is to assess Environmental Flow Requirements
(EFRs) at selected key areas of the Orange River Basin at an “Intermediate Level”.

Main Activities

The main activities included:

  • A scoping level assessment of ecological and socio-cultural condition and importance across the basin.
  • Delineation into Management Resource Units and selection of Environmental Flow Requirements sites.
  • One biophysical survey to collate the relevant data at each Environmental Flow Requirements site.
  • Measurements at a low and a high flow to calibrate the hydraulic model.
  • Assessment of the Present Ecological State and other ecological state scenarios
  • Assessment of flow requirements following a holistic approach, preferably those developed specifically for local and regional conditions for each ecological state.
  • Assessment of the ecosystem services, also referred to as Goods and Services
  • Monitoring aspects.

Conclusions

Environmental Flow Requirements

The detailed conclusions for each of the Environmental Flow requirements sites are provided in the reports below.

No environmental flow requirements were set at the first Environmental Flow Requirements site “EFR 1” (downstream of Vanderkloof Dam) as it was felt that there would be no scope in terms of adjusting flows. The ecological state was assessed and recommendations made that included non-flow related measures.

“EFR 8” situated in the Molopo wetlands downstream of the Molopo eye was also approached in a different manner. Setting flow requirements within such a modified system will serve no purpose. In order to improve the wetland the main objectives set for “EFR 8” were to revert back to a functioning wetland which can be achieved by:

  • Improved Phragmites cover.
  • Reinstatement of shallow areas with constant depth.
  • Cease spraying of toxic pesticides for control of the Red-billed Quelea (Quelea quelea) and reeds.

Good and Services

The range of Goods and Services available at the lower end of the Orange River ensures that
these reaches are rendered more sensitive to management interventions. The converse is generally true for the upper sites. In addition, there are a body of users of Goods and Services in the lower part of the Orange for whom livelihood and linkage to these Goods and Services is of paramount importance. Conversely for the Caledon, particularly the upper site, in spite of a dependency on Goods and Services, the highly impacted state of the river means that management interventions will not result in substantial changes to the delivery of Goods and Services. In addition, in these areas the most important management interventions will not be flow-related and probably relate to a wider programme of catchment management. The Kraai River is in many respects in a good state, and the usage relatively low. As such, management interventions will not yield dramatic results. These were derived from modelling the results for each EFR site with the importance of each category of Goods and Services weighted. Those deemed to be most important at the site were given a weighting of 100. Those of marginal importance were given lesser weightings.

Recommendations

Based on the confidence evaluation of the results, recommendations were made where additional information is required to improve the confidence. These recommendations can be found in the reports below. A recommendation which is standard for all the Environmental Flow Requirements sites is to initiate an Ecological Water Resources Monitoring (EWRM) programme as this is essential to measure whether objectives are being achieved.

This would lead to a key strategic level actions that are required as part of a basin-wide plan
that should include the following:

  • Testing of various operational scenarios that could include new developments or changes in the existing operation of the system. Testing of these scenarios must be done in terms of changes in ecological state and Goods and Services.
  • These results should then be presented to the stakeholders so that agreement can be reached on the future ecological state of the river.
  • An extensive and joint monitoring system should then be implemented. It is strongly recommended that an Ecological Water Resources Monitoring (EWRM) programme is initiated as soon as possible. The information gathered during this study is suitable for the baseline, but if too much time relapses between the baseline and monitoring, new surveys and Eco-Classification process will have to be undertaken. It must be noted that monitoring of essential Goods and Services should be included as part of the EWRM.

Source:

Support to Phase 2 of the ORASECOM Basin-wide Integrated Water Resources Management Plan

Funding Organisation(s):

GIZ

Date:

2011

Documents

Birkhead, A. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements: Main Report Volume 3 Appendix A – Ecohydraulics

Huggins, G. et al. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements: Goods and services

Koekemoer, S. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements: Main Report Volume 3 Appendix B – Diatome Assessment of the Orange River Main Stem and Associated Tributaries

Kotze, P. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements: Main Report Volume 3 Appendix D – Fish

Mackenzie, J. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements:  Main Report Volume 3 Appendix F – Riparian Vegetation

Louw, D. et al. 2010.  Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements- Delineation of Management Resource Units

Louw, D. et al. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements – Desktop Eco-classification Assessment

Louw, D. et al. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements: Main Report Volume 1

Louw, D. et al. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements: Main Report Volume 2

Sherman, P. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements:  Main Report Volume 3 Appendix C – Water Quality

Palmer, R. et al. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements: Literature survey and gap analysis

Rountree, M. 2010. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements:  Main Report Volume 3 Appendix E – Geomorphology

Click here for Comment

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.